On 3/29/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Paul Cager wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:29:35PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote: > >> The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file, > >> wagon-http-shared etc). What would be the best way to package this: > >> > >> B) One source package generating seven binary packages.
I read the mails in the thread and I agree with Marcus (and I think Michael would agree), this is the best solution: one source package and generate the binary packages you need for Mavane2. If someone want to add a new sub-project, you just have to hack the debian build system and the binary package will appear, no new source package to upload etc...
> I guess if we produce one source package then we should package _all_ of > wagon, not just the bits needed by maven. It don't think this will be a > problem, as it doesn't look like it will pull in any additional > dependencies. Good idea. That sounds like a good solution.
Michael agree also :-D Thanks for your work Paul, -- Arnaud Vandyck -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
