On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:06:48 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote: > Besides XeTeX one also needs xdvipdfmx (also an ITP). Here the > relationship with the existing dvipdfmx packages are non trivial. At > least when build with upstream's Debian packaging the two packages have > to conflict since they contain some identical files. Given that there > recently was a case where functionality from dvipdfmx was lost in > xdvipdfmx, it probably would be best to not install these files in the > xdvipdfmx package but depend on dvipdfmx instead.
I splitted the original xdvipdfmx into xdvipdfmx (almost binary only) and xdvipdfmx-data (CMaps and config files) temporarily and (my) xdvipdfmx depends on dvipdfmx | xdvipdfmx-data so one can test two environment, xdvipdfmx + dvipdfmx (your suggestion) and xdvipdfmx + xdvipdfmx-data (=the original xdvipdfmx). Regards, 2006-8-25(Fri) -- Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
