On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 01:43:27AM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: > I've seen it, and it seems similar. But the one I packages (already in > svn) is on luaforge, so I preferred it. Moreover it is portable to Win32 > and thus may be more widely adopted.
I don't think luaforge was very well established when I started writing with lua. > Since you know better than me the code, could you please compare the two > libs? The summery you've given already seems fair. > It seems that the one I packaged lacks chmod (It is not portable to > win32). I think it should go to luaposix, next lib on my todo list. > Moreover your lib lacks locking functions, that are portable at least to > win32. Right. > In case you want to package your lib too I can point you to the policy > I'm writing (it becoming really easy to do a lua lib package) and give > you svn access to the repo (pkg-lua). I'd look forward to seeing that. Right now I have packages of my two lua libraries already via http://www.steve.org.uk/apt/ > P.S. Yes, I know. I copied the ITP from the luaexpat one and I forgot to > change some fields :( No problem. I'll be looking forward to working with your lua packages in the future. The posix library I remember looking at looked non-free, but it could well be the case we're talking about different libraries! Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
