On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:09:05AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote: > On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 02:29:00AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I currently have 1 problem, and that is with the ebl library. > > It's only available as a static library, but it can dlopen() > > several shared objects, depending on the arch of the file it's > > trying to use. This causes problem in case someone wants to use > > that library, since the normal shlibs won't work. > > > > What I see as the best option to fix this is to convert all those > > shared objects into one static library, I just didn't have time > > to do this yet. > > That would be one option, I'll look into implementing this. What I'm > wondering though is why libebl is available static-only in the first > place. Do you have any idea?
I have no idea. I assume because it doesn't have a stable API/ABI. I've tried contacting upstream but he never replied. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
