-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:17:20PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote: [snip] > the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece > of software (thus not "Personal Use"), you need to make the > source of openwatcom publicly available for 12 months.
Why is "I must make available the compiler's source code" problematic? It follows in the spirit of that clause of the GPL which says that if you distribute binaries, you must make the source code available. By extending it to the compiler, you ensure that the possibly-modified cc will be available to recreate the executable. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid? For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEqFuvS9HxQb37XmcRAiqyAKCAP4/LfXEGCfcd44l8JwTJWZp0mgCgznbf jwHgGd62XdLHO5s3BEzn/nA= =Fd52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
