Hello Alex, > Selon alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > examining mpc-ace, i found it's dependent on libace and libtao, which > > is, in my opinion, too much for a few perl scripts ;-). > > Ouch, you're right. It depends on libace-dev, and recommends libtao-dev. > > > is this really needed for this special versions of mpc? > > Let me check... Well, I've added this dependency because of the makefile > fragments in rules.* files. I'll have a closer look soon and let you > know. In the meantime, you can install libace-dev and see if you can > get further.
I had a quick look yesterday at OCI's MPC. It is not that different from ACE+TAO's one. Actually, every ACE+TAO release ships with up-to-date MPC. Indeed, ACE+TAO version 5.5.1+1.5.1 is close to MPC version 3.3.xx. Thanks to you, I had a look at Version.pm, and now I know how the `xx' get computed: it is the number of ChangeLog entries since the last major.minor release. (And therefore I know why mpc-ace version displays `??' instead of `xx': it does not find the ChangeLog) So you're correct: mpc-ace should not depend *at all* on libace-dev. I'll fix this, thanks. Thomas
