Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I want to package Forwards (see my ITP [1]), a non-Apache > software under Apache License 1.1 [2]).
[2] is not the Apache License 1.1, but is Apache-1.1-like. I think your ITP License line is incorrect. > I read debian-legal archives to have information about > Apache License version 1.1. Situation seems confuse on the first > thread [3]. This thread [4] explains there is no problem for > Apache software under Apache License. [3] concerns GPL-compatibility. Are you combining with GPL work? > Note that I am intent to call my Debian package 'sork-forwards-h3' > and with very few patches for upstream version. Note also there are > already packages with this license in "main" : sork-passwd-h3, > ingo1, jython, et cetera. Have the Horde Project given written permission for that? It would help avoid the uncertainty. > Could you confirm me that my package will be DFSG-compliant ? Not entirely, but it looks like it probably will be. > [1] : http://bugs.debian.org/362652 > [2] : http://cvs.horde.org/co.php?r=1.1.2.2&f=forwards%2FLICENSE&p=1 > [3] : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2000/06/msg00103.html > [4] : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg00205.html Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
