Jeff Breidenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Matthew, I just built your package on sarge, it went fine. > Good job. > > python2.4-pylucene_1.9-1_i386.deb > > I noticed you chose not to have a README.Debian file. That's probably > ok, since most of the weirdness affects package maintainers and not > package users. On the other hand, you might want to create one and > include a link to this conversation (bug 256283) in case the end user > is wondering why the heck it isn't included in Debian proper. Your > call.
Thank you! I will add a README.Debian, it's a good suggestion. I have access to Debian amd64 and PowerPC architectures. If building for them is identical to building for i386 then I can make those available as well. > Andi, how about distributing the binary package (.deb) from the > PyLucene website while things are shaking out? Or perhaps Matthew > can distribute from canonical.org, and have a link from the PyLucene > homepage? This can be done immediately, allows Debian sarge users > to try out the package and provide feedback, and will make a few people's > lives a little easier. I can't think of any disadvantages. This sounds like a good idea to me. I can rebuild the package for i386, with the README.Debian, and make it available later today. Jeff and Andi, thanks for your time on this so far. Your help is appreciated! -matthew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
