Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:27:15 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing RFAs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 19:46:00 2005 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2005 03:46:00 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.152]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhfOS-0005rJ-Mm for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:46:00 -0800 Received: from basebud.nulle.part (c-67-174-11-185.hsd1.il.comcast.net[67.174.11.185]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005120103450301400gq6q1e>; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 03:45:19 +0000 Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EhfNW-0007tW-MH; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:45:02 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: RFA: dbi -- GNU R package providing a generic database interface From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:45:02 -0600 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wnpp Severity: normal Steffen Moeller is the maintainer of dbi, a database interface for R. I have sponsored a few uploads. The package could use a refreshment. A new version is out. The debian/ directory can probably do with an update. I can help and advise, but cannot take on more packages. I will retitle/refile this as an Orphan bug in a few weeks if nothing changes, after which the package should probably be removed from Debian. Regards, Dirk -- Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty. -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 05 09:27:49 2006 Received: (at 341513-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2006 17:27:49 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.192.83]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F5nfx-0006M4-Lk; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 09:27:49 -0800 Received: from basebud.nulle.part (c-67-174-11-185.hsd1.il.comcast.net[67.174.11.185]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060205172718m13009e5die>; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:27:18 +0000 Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1F5nfQ-0006aI-UD; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 11:27:16 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:27:15 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Closing RFAs X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Now that Steffen has convinced me that he is still maintaining packages I can close the RFAs I had filed in a rather draconian manner earlier. Dirk PS Resending with 8bit clean mail header -- Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. -- Thomas A. Edison
--- End Message ---
