Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:47:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349323: fixed in patch 2.5.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2006 11:03:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 22 03:03:08 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de ([81.169.145.166])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F0d00-0003qW-64
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:03:08 -0800
Received: from varda.local (ppp-82-135-1-234.mnet-online.de [82.135.1.234])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0MB36EY005261
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:03:06 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nienna.local ([192.168.42.2])
        by varda.local with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
        (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
        id 1F0czx-0004tj-TU
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:03:05 +0100
Received: from michael by nienna.local with local (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
        id 1F0czx-00050J-Nl
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:03:05 +0100
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:03:05 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: O: patch -- Apply a diff file to an original
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: Michael Fedrowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

 Package: patch
 Version: 2.5.9-3
 Section: utils
 Priority: standard
 Architecture: i386
 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1)
 Suggests: ed
 Installed-Size: 188
 Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Description: Apply a diff file to an original
  Patch will take a patch file containing any of the four forms
  of difference listing produced by the diff program and apply
  those differences to an original file, producing a patched
  version.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 349323-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2006 18:50:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 28 10:50:27 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F2v6J-0003Mv-Id; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:47:07 -0800
From: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#349323: fixed in patch 2.5.9-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:47:07 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: patch
Source-Version: 2.5.9-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
patch, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

patch_2.5.9-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/patch/patch_2.5.9-4.diff.gz
patch_2.5.9-4.dsc
  to pool/main/p/patch/patch_2.5.9-4.dsc
patch_2.5.9-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/patch/patch_2.5.9-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated patch package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:46:28 +0100
Source: patch
Binary: patch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.5.9-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 patch      - Apply a diff file to an original
Closes: 26675 349323
Changes: 
 patch (2.5.9-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer (Closes: #349323).
   * Use dpatch, add patches:
     + unified-reject-files: write unified reject files (Closes: #26675).
     + global-reject-file: write a global reject file.
     + manpage-char: fix weird character.
   * Suggests: diff-doc.
   * Bump Standards-Version.
Files: 
 49ddebe3e1b1d288fe79b85799a527ef 565 utils standard patch_2.5.9-4.dsc
 3350c53628d52bfdbbcdf16bb901b6ca 54673 utils standard patch_2.5.9-4.diff.gz
 3f59451efcd69aff0afc8e31151cd0fc 99464 utils standard patch_2.5.9-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD27nZxa93SlhRC1oRAtyPAJ9a/VsWNrpVtz42kG5QG9IpCiO7eQCcCCKS
Ed8clIvxLnqGIz6cwQMBxVc=
=q7KE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to