hi, On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:53:17PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > So it appears that the author is happy about modifications and > redistribution, and probably has it in his own interpretation of > freeware. > > Maybe he can be talked into removing the ambiguity and formalizing it in > a clearer existing license? Looks like he's wanting a BSD one.
from the excerpt you provided, i think that text is quite clear already.
nothing wrong with formalizing the license, but i don't see any reason
why the code as-is can't be in debian (though i could understand that
ftp-masters might drag their feet for a bit on accepting a non-standard
license).
sean
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
