Hi! * grayman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051004 23:24]: > > I have to disagree. dpkg can print very complex messages, which most > > users certainly will not understand, even if they can read =P > And what is your point here exactly? Debinstaller is not good enough, > because it dont spit user friendly messages? > Oh wait, so is dpkg! Since debinstaller is just a simple FRONTEND i > dont see any problems with it.
I thought the idea behind debinstaller was to have something more userfriendly? And I think the target groups of debinstaller and dpkg are slightly different. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature