Hi!

* grayman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051004 23:24]:
> > I have to disagree. dpkg can print very complex messages, which most
> > users certainly will not understand, even if they can read =P
> And what is your point here exactly? Debinstaller is not good enough,
> because it dont spit user friendly messages?
> Oh wait, so is dpkg! Since debinstaller is just a simple FRONTEND i
> dont see any problems with it.

I thought the idea behind debinstaller was to have something more
userfriendly?  And I think the target groups of debinstaller and dpkg
are slightly different.


Yours sincerely,
  Alexander

-- 
http://learn.to/quote/
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to