Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330675: fixed in gnome-print 0.37-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 08:17:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 01:17:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pig.zood.org [194.242.112.24] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EKtbD-0005Cd-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 01:17:03 -0700
Received: by pig.zood.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id CE0E84C0A1; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:16:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:16:57 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: gnome-print
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Debbugs-Cc: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

        Hi,

 After some checks with the pkg-gnome maintainers, and following the
 discussions in debian-gtk-gnome and debian-release concerning the
 status of GNOME 1, I'm orphaning a couple of GNOME 1 packages.

 If you're interested in adopting this package, please take contact with
 Thomas Bushnell (which is in copy) since he suggested he might adopt
 the packages.

   Bye,
--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 330675-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2005 05:48:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 22:48:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ELDjd-00075Y-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:47:05 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#330675: fixed in gnome-print 0.37-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:47:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gnome-print
Source-Version: 0.37-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-print, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnome-print_0.37-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-print/gnome-print_0.37-7.diff.gz
gnome-print_0.37-7.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnome-print/gnome-print_0.37-7.dsc
libgnomeprint-bin_0.37-7_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-print/libgnomeprint-bin_0.37-7_powerpc.deb
libgnomeprint-data_0.37-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-print/libgnomeprint-data_0.37-7_all.deb
libgnomeprint-dev_0.37-7_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-print/libgnomeprint-dev_0.37-7_powerpc.deb
libgnomeprint15_0.37-7_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-print/libgnomeprint15_0.37-7_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnome-print 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:20:00 -0700
Source: gnome-print
Binary: libgnomeprint-bin libgnomeprint-dev libgnomeprint-data libgnomeprint15
Architecture: source all powerpc
Version: 0.37-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libgnomeprint-bin - The GNOME Print architecture - binary files
 libgnomeprint-data - The GNOME Print architecture - data files
 libgnomeprint-dev - The GNOME Print architecture - development files
 libgnomeprint15 - The GNOME Print architecture - runtime library
Closes: 330675
Changes: 
 gnome-print (0.37-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Set new maintainer correctly. (Closes: #330675)
Files: 
 f71da0c7f1efcfaf10b32bb7da972601 840 admin optional gnome-print_0.37-7.dsc
 b0af1a4c2a8e0ebe25f2e2add4ac0d42 12589 admin optional 
gnome-print_0.37-7.diff.gz
 7ed42a3021257116805d08aeb7851849 209542 oldlibs optional 
libgnomeprint-data_0.37-7_all.deb
 5ec012ac53b0f5b3dcb30a9025ec1280 248722 oldlibs optional 
libgnomeprint15_0.37-7_powerpc.deb
 0aa23c85af3443ead6d07414f0fac19e 353928 libdevel optional 
libgnomeprint-dev_0.37-7_powerpc.deb
 83f77854b29b857d769e3e3bd78c9514 30462 oldlibs optional 
libgnomeprint-bin_0.37-7_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDPM4qqMsB9b6fcOoRAqNwAJ4j7HVyCHUC8I8837ydE/R6t4Zw9gCcCVyO
tN31EQu4Tg7qnmDwEDj0YmI=
=Wkwv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to