Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:28 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 12:46:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 10 05:46:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from seth.intheinter.net (seth2.intheinter.net) [82.165.43.70]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuW1q-0004y6-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:46:58 -0700
Received: from cocaine.ring2.lan (c134160.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.134.160])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by seth2.intheinter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23A2EEA14;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ecstasy.ring2.lan ([192.168.50.4])
by cocaine.ring2.lan with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BuW1J-0001Vp-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:46:25 +0200
Received: by ecstasy.ring2.lan (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 10 Aug 2004
14:46:24 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFP: acpiw -- ACPI Watch: GUI and CLI for watching /proc/acpi/*
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:46:24 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : (gtk)acpiw
Version : .75
Upstream Author : Oliver Diedrich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://www.heise.de/ct/ftp/02/25/234/
* License : GPL
Description : ACPI Watch: GUI and CLI for watching /proc/acpi/*
<snip>
'ACPI watch' displays the directory tree under /proc/acpi and the
content of the files in /proc/acpi and its subdirectories. It monitors
the files for changes and displays changed file entries. It should give
you an idea not only which information is presented in /proc/acpi, but
also which part of this information is static and which part changes
dynamically.
</snip>
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 264800-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:18:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 16:18:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaKi-0001oK-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:18:28 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaKi-0006y4-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:28 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:28 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:
reopen 264800
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
