Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:45 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2004 12:37:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 19 05:37:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mid-1.inet.it [213.92.5.18]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BmXOF-0000m5-00; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 05:37:07 -0700
Received: from atm0-1.gw-smsrmadsl.inet.it [::ffff:194.185.140.234] by
mid-1.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.1.10-51A
id ::ffff:194.185.140.234+4gfCTlqA1; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:36:59 +0200
Received: from mattia by inferi with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BmXO4-0002kW-FN; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:36:56 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:36:56 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : libmqueue
Version : 4.41
Upstream Author : Michal Wronski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Krzysztof Benedyczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www-users.mat.uni.torun.pl/~wrona/posix_ipc/
* License : LGPL
Description : POSIX message queues library for Linux
POSIX message queues are part of IPC used to exchange messages between
processes. Since 2.6.6-rc1 it has been included into Linux kernel.
Message queues are implemented as a filesystem called mqueue. Library
adds appropriate interface to a mqueue filesystem which is compliant
with POSIX standard (IEEE Std 1003.1-2001).
-----------------------------------------
Note (not to be included in description):
This library has been included in glibc 2.3.4 (04/08/2004 in changelog)
and will no more actively maintaind by upstream as a separate library.
I'd like to package libmqueue before sarge to allow sarge users use this
feature (also, Debian's 2.6 kernel come with CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE=y).
The topic has been breifly discussed on -glibc[1] but I'd like to also
hear -devel opinions on how much mess could the inclusion of such
library cause, since as soon as sarge is released a glibc upgrade will
happen and I'll have to maintain an almost dead library for sarge only.
If the inclusion into main is not worth the efffort I can still provide
the library through other means (eg: mentors.debian.net)
Thanks
[1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2004/07/msg00248.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 260222-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:17:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 16:17:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaK2-0000xD-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:17:46 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaK1-0006kF-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:45 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:45 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:
reopen 260222
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* ITPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
