Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:06 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2004 14:46:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 08 07:46:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail1.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at [140.78.3.68]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BBanb-0005cn-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 07:46:36 -0700
Received: from bonsai (gast3.ssw.uni-linz.ac.at [140.78.145.103])
by mail1.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
i38Ek2RR062338;
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:46:02 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: by bonsai (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 72B2EB0101; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:46:56 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: ml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: cocosourcescs -- Coco/R Compiler Generator.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:46:56 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : cocosourcescs
Version : 2004.04.06
Upstream Author : Hanspeter Moessenboeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Markus
Loeberbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Albrecht Woess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ssw.uni-linz.ac.at/Research/Projects/Coco
* License : GPL
Description : Coco/R Compiler Generator.
This is the Csharp version of Coco/R, a compiler generator which takes an
attributed grammar of a source language and
generates a scanner and a parser for this language. The scanner works as a
deterministic finite automaton.
The parser uses recursive descent. LL(1) conflicts can be resolved by a
multi-symbol lookahead or by semantic checks.
Thus the class of accepted grammars is LL(k) for an arbitrary k.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_AT.UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242750-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 21:59:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 14:59:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICcN-0004fo-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:59:07 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICcM-0004Hr-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:06 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:06 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 450 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:
reopen 242750
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* ITPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 20 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
