Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:51 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 22:05:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 15:05:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail2-116.ewetel.de (mail2.ewetel.de) [212.6.122.116]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGmJc-0003b1-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:05:04 -0700
Received: from mail.winnegan.de (dynadsl-080-228-73-009.ewetel.net
[80.228.73.9])
by mail2.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i3MM4PMo028395;
Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:04:27 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from puntila (puntila.winnegan.fake [192.168.53.6])
by mail.winnegan.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0D39D38178; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:04:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by puntila (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 185A7E003A93; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:04:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:04:24 +0200
From: "Bernd S. Brentrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFA: neon -- An HTTP and WebDAV client library
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.56
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-CheckCompat: OK
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the neon package.
The package description is:
neon is an HTTP and WebDAV client library, with a C language API.
.
WARNING: THE NEON API IS NOT YET STABLE.
.
Provides lower-level interfaces to directly implement new HTTP
methods, and higher-level interfaces so that you don't have to
worry about the lower-level stuff.
.
Current features:
* High-level interface to HTTP and WebDAV methods (PUT, GET, HEAD etc)
* Low-level interface to HTTP request handling, to allow implementing
new methods easily.
* persistent connections
* RFC2617 basic and digest authentication (including auth-int, md5-sess)
* Proxy support (including basic/digest authentication)
* SSL/TLS support using OpenSSL (including client certificate support)
* Generic WebDAV 207 XML response handling mechanism
* XML parsing using the expat or libxml parsers
* Easy generation of error messages from 207 error responses
* WebDAV resource manipulation: MOVE, COPY, DELETE, MKCOL.
* WebDAV metadata support: set and remove properties, query any set ofi
properties (PROPPATCH/PROPFIND).
* autoconf macros supplied for easily embedding neon directly inside an
application source tree.
The package has 2 RC bugs open, the 2nd one being ridiculous IMHO
since the documentation in libneon24-doc contains the license, YMMV.
I have no inclination to deal with this disgusting legalese and will
orphan the package if no one takes it within say 2 weeks.
Note that subversion depends on libneon24 which is built from neon
sources.
Regards
. Siggy
--=20
gelesen auf #debian.de am 19.02.2004:
18:06:51 <Wulf> was gibt's denn fuer'n puzzle spiel wo ich ein foto hab
und das in quadrate o.ae. aufgeteilt wird, die ich dann wieder richtig
zusammensetzen muss?
18:07:09 <yath> Wulf: ReiserFS?
18:07:33 <Joey[tm]> Wulf, ich haette xpuzzle anstatt reiserfs gedacht,
aber reiserfs ist spannender.
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAiEFo94B/SGO8KQcRAuvgAKDLU+RKinD1tHWy+ETVdIzVfc65fwCfQjQR
5hCrhhUqEhOIYEuKhGOiQQM=
=yOpD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 245392-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 22:00:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 15:00:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICe4-0005Dr-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:00:52 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICe3-0004UV-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:51 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:51 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 450 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:
reopen 245392
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 20 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
