Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:48 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2004 10:35:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 03 02:35:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from biedermanns.com (mail.biedermanns.com) [213.133.98.83] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AyTjJ-0008TA-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 02:35:57 -0800
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193] helo=tausendmorgenwald)
by mail.biedermanns.com with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AyThf-00048I-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 11:34:15 +0100
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AyTj2-0000uO-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 11:35:40 +0100
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:35:40 +0100
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFP: papercut -- nntp server frontend for webbased forums
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s
!:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : papercut
Version : 0.9.12
Upstream Author : Joao Prado Maia <jpm AT pessoal.org>
* URL : http://www.papercut.org/
* License : BSD
Description : nntp server frontend for webbased forums
Papercut is a news server written in Python. Its main objective is to integrate
existing web based message board software (Phorum is one of the supported ones)
with an Usenet front-end. However, its extensibility enables developers to
write their own containers for the storage of the Usenet articles (messages).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be really nice if you could pick it up. I know next to nothing
about python so if I would be working on it I wouldn't upload it into
the Debian pool -- I would just "use" it.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar raised interest but isn't into python neither.
But as phpBB maintainer he would be interested that the hook for phpBB
works well. FWIW, Tollef Fog Heen has worked out a hook for phpBB before
(but hasn't used it recently, so doesn't know if it is still working):
<http://gamma.hardware.no/~tfheen/phpbb_mysql.py>
Thanks in anyone interested in it. I guess the userbase would be quite
well because I still hope that many Debian users prefer NNTP over
webbased forums :)
So long,
Alfie
--
The following two statements are usually both true:
There's not enough documentation.
There's too much documentation.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 235941-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 22:00:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 15:00:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICe1-00059c-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:00:49 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICe0-0004RI-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:48 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:48 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 450 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:
reopen 235941
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 20 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
