Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:02 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2002 19:46:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 18 13:46:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cable200-75-65-236.epm.net.co (atropos) [200.75.65.236] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18Ok9A-0006w3-00; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:46:25 -0600
Received: by atropos (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id C514FF83; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:46:21 -0500 (COT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITP: jpgraph -- OO Graph Library for PHP
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis Bustamante)
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: The Debian Project
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:46:21 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0
        tests=NOSPAM_INC,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
              USER_AGENT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-18
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : jpgraph
  Version         : 1.10
  Upstream Author : Johan Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL             : http://www.aditus.nu/jpgraph/
* License         : Dual QPL 1.0 (non-free?) and Commercial
  Description     : OO Graph Library for PHP

  JpGraph is an OO class library for PHP 4.1 (or higher). JpGraph
makes it easy to draw both "quick and dirty" graphs with a minimum of
code and complex professional graphs which requires a very fine grain
control. JpGraph is equally well suited for both scientific and
business type of graphs.

[cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  I want to package this software because the latest version of
acidlab (which hasn't been uploaded yet[1]) requires it instead of
phplot like previous version for graphing alert data of an
IDS/Firewall. Anyway I'm not sure if we can include it in Debian as it
uses QPL 1.0 and the author says in his page:

 "JpGraph is released under a dual license.  QPL 1.0 (Qt Free
  Licensee) For non-commercial, open-source and educational use and
  JpGraph Professional License[2] for commercial use."

  Can we include it in non-free despite the restriction it holds for
commercial use? (if so acidlab should be in contrib then)

  Cheers,

References:
1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=155212
2. http://www.aditus.nu/jpgraph/jpgprolicense.pdf

-- 
Luis Bustamante                 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Better hope the life-inspector doesn't come around while you have
 your life in such a mess."

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 173601-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 21:59:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 14:59:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EICcI-0004ZO-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:59:02 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EICcI-0004Cp-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:02 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:02 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 450 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:

reopen 173601
thanks bts

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* ITPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 20 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to