On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 13:06 -0500, Reed Snellenberger wrote: > I originally intended to adopt two orphaned packages (goats (1) and > ksetisaver (2)), and followed the ITA procedures to the letter. I've since > developed a time crunch (a new job) and found that I'm not going to be able > to adopt either package. It doesn't look like this case is covered in the > "Work-Needing and Prospsective Packages" online HOW-TO document(3). > > I've already retitled the wnpp bugs back to "O: xxxxx", but it wasn't clear > to me how to re-set the bug's ownership to eliminate my email -- I thought > about using the "noowner" control message, but thought there should be a > "default" owner for the bug.
Not really. Actually when in a "normal" bug is activated an owner, that means that the bug has an owner other than the usual maintainer of the package, which I find very useful when trying to query all the wnpp bugs on my side, for example. Setting ownership means taking responsibility of squashing it, only. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: C671257D Not only is it better to have loved and lost, it's cheaper. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
