Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:11 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2003 02:01:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 17 20:01:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from quebec.procergs.com.br [200.198.128.236]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18kx4n-00064e-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 20:01:41 -0600
Received: from retteb.casa (200-180-238-011.pltce7001.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br
[200.180.238.11])
by quebec.procergs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7D14173040; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:01:08 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by retteb.casa (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 28A396A2; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:01:00 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: libprevayler-java -- Prevayler - Java Object Prevalence. Library
runtime.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:01:00 -0300
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-17
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : libprevayler-java
Version : 1.03.003alpha
Upstream Author : Klaus Wuestefeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.prevayler.org
* License : LGPL
Description : Prevayler - Java Object Prevalence. Library runtime.
The package are done and builded in 3 packages. The debian/control was included.
Source: prevayler
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Maintainer: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), doxygen, tetex-bin, jikes, kaffe (>=
1.0.7)
Standards-Version: 3.5.8
Package: libprevayler-java
Section: libs
Architecture: all
Depends: kaffe | java1-runtime
Suggests: kaffe | java-virtual-machine
Description: Prevayler - Java Object Prevalence. Library runtime.
Several thousands of times faster than a database, Prevayler is based
on the ridiculously simple and extremely powerful concept of
Prevalence (ACID transactions, transparent persistence,
fault-tolerance and load-balancing of native Java business
objects). No pre or post-processing of your classes is required.
Package: libprevayler-java-demo
Section: devel
Architecture: all
Depends: libprevayler-java (= ${Source-Version}), bzip2
Description: Prevayler - Java Object Prevalence. Demo / Sample source.
Several thousands of times faster than a database, Prevayler is based
on the ridiculously simple and extremely powerful concept of
Prevalence (ACID transactions, transparent persistence,
fault-tolerance and load-balancing of native Java business
objects). No pre or post-processing of your classes is required.
Package: libprevayler-java-doc
Section: doc
Architecture: all
Suggests: libprevayler-java (= ${Source-Version})
Description: Prevayler - Java Object Prevalence. Javadoc documentation.
Several thousands of times faster than a database, Prevayler is based
on the ridiculously simple and extremely powerful concept of
Prevalence (ACID transactions, transparent persistence,
fault-tolerance and load-balancing of native Java business
objects). No pre or post-processing of your classes is required.
The upstream author did all needed changes to works well with kaffe so
the package are going to main :-)
The first revision of package is waiting for approval by ftp-master
since 13/12/2002 and a new revision is wait for upload.
TIA,
Otavio
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux retteb.casa 2.4.20 #1 Sat Feb 1 12:17:01 BRST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-1 (ignored: LC_ALL set)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181439-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 19:55:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net)
[201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjuV-0000xV-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:39 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7CAB7107877; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:11 -0500 (CDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:11 -0500 (CDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 250
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
