Hi, it's fine with me, just one remark: I actually thought I'd close the bug and if you look at the changelog, you'll see that I close it in version 1.2.2-1. Due to different back and forth with my sponsor, only version 1.2.2-6 was finally uploaded as initial release.
Wouldn't it make sense to extend the search for "Close" specifications to all the changes since last upload of the package? Or what would have been the correct way for me to handle this case? (I don't remember having seen anything about this case in the documentation) Or is it just an (unwritten?) rule that all closes must be in the last changes section when uploading? Thanks and sorry for the trouble, Eric > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #296118: ITP: libjcalendar-java -- Java date chooser bean for, > which was filed against the wnpp package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate > message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email. > > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > Received: (at 296118-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 02:58:47 +0000 > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 19:58:47 2005 > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) > by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) > id 1E5E8d-0004hL-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:58:47 -0700 > Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 > (Debian)) > id 1E5E8d-0000Gf-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:58:47 -0600 > Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:58:47 -0600 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Package exists in the archive > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i > From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 > (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE > autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 > > It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have > uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please > read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling > WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload > with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #296118)". Thanks. > Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package, > in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package > seems to be in the archive now. > > Information about the package already in the archive: > > Package: libjcalendar-java > Binary: libjcalendar-java, libjcalendar-java-doc > Version: 1.2.2-6 > Priority: optional > Section: contrib/libs > Maintainer: Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), cdbs (>= 0.4.8), j2sdk1.4 | > j2sdk1.5 | java2-compiler, ant > Architecture: all > Standards-Version: 3.6.1 > Format: 1.0 > Directory: pool/contrib/libj/libjcalendar-java > Files: 80fa881babc7b91a5054c44040279a7c 694 libjcalendar-java_1.2.2-6.dsc > bdfa163830bb1f039b04f386903a77bb 136277 > libjcalendar-java_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz > 5c6f3defd6505221e33a58f6b2803323 2744 libjcalendar-java_1.2.2-6.diff.gz > > -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre
