On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 11:02 +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote: > Hello David, Hi :-)
> I am not sure Content Manager is a good description, may be > Information Manager is closer to what it seem to target. For me, > content management is about structure and appearence, not calendar > events and instant messaging. I agree, I'll change the CMS part into a description focused on structure and appearance app. > I also think it could serve the presumtive user better if you > rewrite the short description in this way: > > : Web-based Personal Content Manager System written in PHP > > or may be even better (because of what it seem to target) > > : Web-based Personal Information Management System written in PHP I disagree here, in the 'written in PHP' part. I like my descriptions to be as plain as possible, a non-technical user doesn't need to know it is written in PHP, they don't need to have it on the short descriptions. > Just a thought. I appreciate it, thanks. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ UNIX es the answer, but only if you phrase the question very carefully. GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C671 257D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
