Your message dated Sat, 6 Aug 2005 14:00:21 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package exists in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 06:01:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 14 23:01:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcp05454496pcs.sandia01.nm.comcast.net (balefire.icecavern.net)
[68.35.95.14]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DiQyJ-0002K7-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:01:55 -0700
Received: from tonberry.icecavern.net (tonberry.icecavern.net [10.0.0.9])
by balefire.icecavern.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06751BF69;
Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:01:54 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by tonberry.icecavern.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 992FE44219; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:01:54 -0600 (MDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: libnet-irc-ruby
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:01:54 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I adopting this package a while back, because I used it and it was
orphaned. However, circumstances have changed a bit:
1) I haven't used this package in quite a while,
2) It doesn't seem to be maintained upstream,
3) According to popcon, out of the 8 people who have installed,
it, 0 of them have used it recently... and since I almost
always have the packages I maintain installed on several
computers, 3-5 of those popcon numbers are probably me.
So anyway, I'm putting this up as an RFA for now. There is nothing wrong
with the package or program as far as I know. I've used it in the past
without any problems, and I expect it to be forward compatible with new
Ruby versions for the most part.
If nobody picks this up in a few months and I don't see that there is
any activity either upstream or in popcon, I will probably just orphan
the package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 314192-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 20:00:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 13:00:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1UqD-0006Fs-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 13:00:21 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1UqD-00081U-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 14:00:21 -0600
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 14:00:21 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package exists in the archive
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have
uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please
read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling
WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload
with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #314192)". Thanks.
Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package,
in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package
seems to be in the archive now.
Information about the package already in the archive:
Package: libnet-irc-ruby
Binary: libnet-irc-ruby
Version: 0.14-4
Priority: extra
Section: interpreters
Maintainer: Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper
Build-Depends-Indep: ruby
Architecture: all
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/libn/libnet-irc-ruby
Files: cf82b17aa1519bec491a136544b18213 609 libnet-irc-ruby_0.14-4.dsc
4cd0bf4086e3b5b86901ccdd4022482d 36740 libnet-irc-ruby_0.14.orig.tar.gz
1ab1210f2dba330615f0ee3f21ee28a9 4459 libnet-irc-ruby_0.14-4.diff.gz
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
