Your message dated Fri, 8 Jul 2005 03:29:46 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please close WNPP bugs properly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 11:57:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 03:57:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 137.red-62-57-138.user.auna.net (khazad.dyndns.org) 
[62.57.138.137] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D9MIH-0006EU-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:57:34 -0800
Received: from rmh by khazad.dyndns.org with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1D9MBz-0002Ej-OL
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:51:03 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: libsem
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:51:03 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

Hi!

The GNU/kFreeBSD port no longer depends on libsem (as it switched to
linuxthreads) and I'm told the GNU/Hurd port will soon switch to NPTL, so it
won't need libsem either.

Unless someone who is actualy interested in libsem volunteers to maintain it,
I'll request its removal within a week or so.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-5
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298856-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2005 09:30:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 08 02:30:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DqpBa-0002Kc-00; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 02:30:18 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DqpB5-0008Ow-00; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 03:29:47 -0600
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 03:29:46 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please close WNPP bugs properly
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed" rather than closed properly.  This might
be because your sponsor uploaded the package in a wrong way, or because
your upload was mistakenly recognizes as an NMU.  Please take this into
account in the future, and do close WNPP bugs properly.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to