Hi, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I will not sponsor you in the typical way, where you are tagged as the > maintainer of the package (I believe that praxis to be broken: you do > not have access to all developer tools, and our structures do not
err? what exactly? He has all the packages, BTS, PTS, etc available. > support getting hold of you in case of problems). Instead, I will adopt uh? He gets the BTS mails, you know his email etc. > the package and work with you on the packaging, and when you are a > developer and I (most probably) still feel confident that you are To becoming a developer he need to have a own package already. If you are Maintainer: he doesn't have one. > capable of maintaining it properly, I will hand the maintainership over > to you. > > Does that sound fair to you? It looks fundamentally broken. Just sponsor it the normal way. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
