also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.08.0909 +0100]: > Generally the dpkg-* namespace is reserved for features that are > intended for integration into dpkg at some point.
well, by all means then. If dpkg-repack and dpkg-www are intended for integration into dpkg, then reversion should be too. I really think reversion should be available. > Can you please use deb-reversion instead? I could, and I do not have a preference. What do others say? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
