Your message dated Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:57:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bad bug report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2004 19:27:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 10 12:27:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-gw3.metropolis-inter.com (mail-gw3.mi.cl) [200.30.193.20]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C5r34-0003Et-00; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:27:07 -0700
Received: by mail-gw3.mi.cl (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.1)
with PIPE id 2642780; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:27:07 -0400
Received: from [200.30.193.17] (HELO mail1.mi.cl)
by mail-gw3.mi.cl (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1)
with ESMTP id 2642776; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:27:03 -0400
Received: from [200.74.167.169] (account [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail1.mi.cl (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.1)
with HTTP id 49317674; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:26:58 -0400
From: "Pedro Villavicencio Garrido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: gtk-theme-switch
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.1
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:26:58 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TFF-CGPSA-Filter: Scanned
X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
i use frequently this package, i have the knowledge that
you
require,experience in gtk/gnome programming and i'm really
interesting of
do the package maintainer of it.
thanks greetings.
pedro.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 271043-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2004 14:58:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 11 07:58:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C69KE-0003wh-00; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 07:58:02 -0700
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
id 1C69KC-00079k-00; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:58:00 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C69K2-0004VB-00; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:57:50 +0100
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:57:50 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pedro Villavicencio Garrido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bad bug report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 10:30:38AM -0400, Pedro Villavicencio Garrido wrote:
> hello, so yesterday somebody i made a reply to a adoption (gtk-theme-
> switch) and my bad internet provider send the bug to another address
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) can you erase that please? thanks you.
Just close it, as I have done with this message.
By the way, if you want to prevent this problem then don't needlessly
include "Package:" lines when you're replying to bugs, and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will reject the mail if it reaches there by accident.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
