Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:40:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2001 14:34:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 21 09:34:00 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 24-168-215-96.he.cox.rr.com (Maxwell.local) [24.168.215.96]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15kRNQ-0004ft-00; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 09:34:00 -0500
Received: from bohr.local ([192.168.65.5] helo=localhost)
by Maxwell.local with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
id 15jwyr-0000Np-00; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:06:37 -0400
Received: from anthony by localhost with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 15jwyp-0005db-00; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:06:37 -0400
From: Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFP: bcp -- Copies files over links so lossy TCP does not work
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.28
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.28
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:06:35 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-20
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* Package name : bcp
Version : 010103
Upstream Author : "Clock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~clock/twibright/bcp/
* License : GPL
Description : Copies files over links so lossy TCP does not work
- -- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bohr 2.4.7 #3 SMP Fri Jul 27 17:05:49 EDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7qYdt5lsmI6uA7bQRAseyAKCKGEVQbi/qswyX5WCIVtxupSGK6gCfZ3an
LJBVxAC7t1hyMBUi7mS9WXo=
=B3SY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 113051-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 18:39:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 31 11:39:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C2DXx-00058Y-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:39:57 -0700
Received: from pd9589a37.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.88.154.55] helo=legolas)
by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with asmtp
(TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1C2DXv-0001nm-Et; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:39:56 +0200
Received: from jmm by legolas with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1C2DYO-0000Yg-0S; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:40:24 +0200
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:40:23 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.88.154.55
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing outdated RFPs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7
This RFP has been closed as it is very old and the requested program
isn't even under active maintenance since at least two years. If the
program is really important to you, please revive it upstream first.
Cheers,
Moritz
