Your message dated 18 Aug 2004 13:04:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line whoops
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 03:19:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 02 20:19:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.golden.net [199.166.210.31]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Brppa-0000T3-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:19:14 -0700
Received: from 185-181.speede.golden.net ([216.75.185.181] helo=horta)
by smtp.golden.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
id 1Brppa-0004Dr-3u; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 23:19:14 -0400
Received: from treacy by horta with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BrppZ-0007B9-NA; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 23:19:13 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: libofx -- Development package for libofx0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 23:19:13 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Too little free time. Orphaning libofx.
The package description is:
This file provides header files and related support for developing
packages that use libofx0
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263129-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2004 20:04:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 18 13:04:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BxWfq-0004rw-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:04:42 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BxWfq-0003IE-4G; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:04:42 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: whoops
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: Even your dog won't like it.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 18 Aug 2004 13:04:42 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 5
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
These duplicated previous RFA bugs (which I have now ITA'd) and
shouldn't exist separately.
Thomas
