Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2001 02:24:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 20:24:22 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from calc.cheney.cx [::ffff:207.70.169.246] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14SV8f-000110-00; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:24:21 -0600
Received: from ccheney by calc.cheney.cx with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 14SV8e-0003Sx-00; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:24:20 -0600
From: Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: Ogg Tarkin -- Ogg Tarkin is the video codec part of Xiphophorus 
OggSquish
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.13
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.13
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:24:20 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-02-12
Severity: wishlist

I will be packaging Ogg Tarkin as soon as it reaches a usable state.

It will be LGPL/GPL.

Chris Cheney

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux calc 2.4.2-pre3 #1 Sat Feb 10 13:58:43 CST 2001 i686


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 85784-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 21:56:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 14:56:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.xs4all.be [195.144.64.135] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BxBwi-0003kc-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:56:44 -0700
Received: from lucretia.hangar.be (195-144-080-143.dyn.adsl.xs4all.be 
[195.144.80.143])
        by smtp1.xs4all.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7HLugYN031925;
        Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:43 +0200
Received: by lucretia.hangar.be (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id F3C9E5B42; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:45 +0200
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cleanup
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Marks-The-Spot: xxxxxxxxxx
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/8E950E00 CAC1 0932 B6B9 8768 40DB  C6AA 1239 F709 8E95 
0E00
X-Machine-info: Linux lucretia 2.6.7-1-686 i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10

It seems that this package already exists in the archive.  If you have
uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please
read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling
WNPP bugs properly.  You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload
with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #bugnumber)".  Thanks.
Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package,
in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package
seems to be in the archive now.


-- 
A. Top posters.
Q. What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Reply via email to