Il lun, 2004-08-16 alle 08:47, Filip Van Raemdonck ha scritto: > No, because it is a dupe for #181506. While they had been merged, the > second did not provide any useful info beyond what was in the first > report. IMHO wnpp bug list is long enough as it is, we should not keep > merged bugs there unless there is a good reason to keep them. > > Pardon me for using the "close" [EMAIL PROTECTED] way, I should have waited > for > the unmerge and then sent a proper [EMAIL PROTECTED] message.
No problem. I thought you closed both! :) I hope someone could finally make packages for that! bye and thanks Christian
