Hi, * Rolandas Juodzbalis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040814 22:40]: > Upstream Author : Chris Lightfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/tpop3d/ > * License : GPL > Description : tpop3d is a fast, extensible, secure UNIX POP3 server > > tpop3d is yet another POP3 server. It is intended to be fast, > extensible, and secure. Supported authentication mechanisms: pam, > passwd, mysql, ldap, perl, external program. tpop3d supports > POP-before-SMTP, DRAC, WHOSON, BSD-format mailspools with index caching > and Maildir.
I can currently count at least these servers than can support pop3 courier-pop dovecot-pop3d ipopd libroxen-pop3 qpopper solid-pop3d teapop xmail Is there any reason why tpop3d should be better than any of those? And if so, which of these servers can we drop IYO? Please don't understand me wrong, but we already have an incredible amount of software in Debian. If I look at the list of orphaned packages, or at the list of long-standing RC-bugs (currently 167 in sarge, much more in sid), than it seems sometimes to me that we have too many than too less packages. Please don't take this personal. It's not meant as an vote about your package, but more like a general remark that's also valid for this package. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
