Your message dated Sat, 14 Aug 2004 17:51:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line wnpp cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2002 23:58:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 28 17:58:58 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (ha1) [212.22.34.8]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16qjnG-0003jz-00; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:58:58 -0600
Received: from localhost.localdomain
(cable243a231.usuarios.retecal.es [212.183.243.231])
by smtp.servicios.retecal.es
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 3 (built Mar 23 2001))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:58:56 +0100 (MET)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:58:55 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ram=F3n?= Rey Vicente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFP: GSFDM -- a Gnome internet downloader with plugin support
To: Debian bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3
Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-I8Bai+eqyF0JxcW8zewv";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=-I8Bai+eqyF0JxcW8zewv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
GSFDM it's a internet downloader for Gnome. It's provide some new
functionnalities, among plug-in support, versative interface, session
managing, able to end connection, Corba support, automatic url content
parsing...=20
License: GPL
URL: http://gsfdm.sourceforge.net/
--=20
Ram=F3n Rey Vicente=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clave p=FAblica GNUPG disponible en=20
http://users.servicios.retecal.es/rrey/clave_publica.rrv.gpg
--=-I8Bai+eqyF0JxcW8zewv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Esta parte del mensaje esta firmada digitalmente
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQA8o64+RGk68b69cdURAnBWAJ9W8DQSW+4gk0EtxSxzXqdZXhtuSwCfQk8y
lPGSYxAHqzKfI0BbijXEixA=
=fqOj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-I8Bai+eqyF0JxcW8zewv--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 140393-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2004 15:51:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 14 08:51:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.xs4all.be [195.144.64.135]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bw0p4-00030U-00; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 08:51:58 -0700
Received: from lucretia.hangar.be (195-144-080-156.dyn.adsl.xs4all.be
[195.144.80.156])
by smtp1.xs4all.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7EFpvYN019482
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 17:51:57 +0200
Received: by lucretia.hangar.be (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0F71022D8E; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 17:51:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 17:51:58 +0200
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wnpp cleanup
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Marks-The-Spot: xxxxxxxxxx
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/8E950E00 CAC1 0932 B6B9 8768 40DB C6AA 1239 F709 8E95
0E00
X-Machine-info: Linux lucretia 2.6.2-rc1 i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This software is not maintained anymore upstream, and there are alternative
graphical download managers which are for GTK+/GNOME 2.x instead of the
deprecated 1.x as this one is.
--
This is *exactly* why I want my MCSE. If nothing else, it's effective
as a slap in the face to those who don't know any better. "And who are
*you* to be criticizing Microsoft?" "I'm a Microsoft Certified
Professional."
(insert mental <thwack!> sound here)
"Any *more* questions, nerd-boy?" -- Joe
