Your message dated Mon, 31 May 2004 22:59:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2002 15:14:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 19 09:14:47 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cafemax.mpol.net (mentat.localdomain) [217.96.2.189]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18EA5P-0000KO-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:14:47 -0600
Received: by mentat.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BF3E1702C; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:14:38 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: ITP: mc-cvs -- development version of midnight commander
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:14:38 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : mc-cvs
Version : 2002-11-06-20
Upstream Author : mc team
* URL : http://www.ibiblio.org/mc/
* License : GPL
Description : development version of midnight commander
I was quite used to nc in my dos times, so mc is the main tool I use
on my Debian system. Therefore I'm a bit worried that mc in Debian is
in a really bad state:
Last developer package:
[2001-09-02] Installed mc 4.5.55-1 (i386 source)
Last NMU:
[2002-02-21] Installed mc 4.5.55-1.2 (i386 source)
I have to admit that mc project has been dead for some time, but now
it's now working and releasing new versions:
Last version 4.6.0-pre1 (released August 21, 2002)
Last snapshot: mc-2002-11-17-07.tar.gz
Since 4.5.55 (Debian last release) MANY things happened. First of all
support for gmc (which is now replaced by nautilus) was depreciated -
so the gnome code was removed from upstream archive, and division to 3
differen packages (mc-common, mc, gmc) is no longer needed. There were
also many code cleanups and fixes, and many bugs have been resolved.
I've contacted mc DD's at [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 7
Nov - haven't got any reply yet - looks like there are MIA.
So I decided to create my own package with new mc - first of all for
my home use, but I consider uploading to Debian archive.
I called it mc-cvs for now, but maybe mc-devel or mc-snapshot will be
better...
BETA version can be found here:
http://www.rpg-portal.pl/alpha/mc-cvs_2002-11-06-20-1_i386.deb
Regards
PLEASE CC to my address, I don't read this list on regular basis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mentat 2.4.19 #1 pon wrz 30 21:29:33 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169756-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2004 20:59:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 31 13:59:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ahs223.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (mentat.prochowa) [83.29.15.223]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUtsa-0005JM-00; Mon, 31 May 2004 13:59:33 -0700
Received: by mentat.prochowa (Postfix, from userid 1005)
id 1121F20536; Mon, 31 May 2004 22:59:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 22:59:19 +0200
From: Adam Byrtek / Alpha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No point in having separate CVS package as the CVS development is
nearly dead :(
--=20
__ _
/ _` | Adam Byrtek -*- jid alpha.jabber.lfa.pl -*- pgp 0xB25952C0
\__,_| "Ka=BFdy idea=B3 w ciele jest trywialny" - prawdy algebraiczne
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAu5yn/CVWerJZUsARAl7GAJwKtVmisVmgRwiQ7L4Cu4+BaDMKSwCeLgyg
w7eBA6fZio+CSSuOmShpru4=
=YoKX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--
