On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:51:20AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:28:32AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > > Eh? Did you check whether something happened to that bug first? I > > guessed you didn't / missed it, since you didn't mail me. > > Sorry, not my fault. I did check but at that time your mail wasn't archived > yet and couldn't see it.
Of course, stupid of me... I shouldn't have mailed while tired :). Sorry. (...) > Indeed, he's on CC. Well, so are you interested in co-maintaining > netkit-ntalk? In principle yes -- though the packages is quite simple (so it might be a bit overkill). I'll get back to you when I have comething concrete I think -- don't know yet and aren't in a rush. > I see that you're still in NM. This shouldn't be a problem as I can sponsor > your work if you like. Indeed. Still doesn't help me 'rushing' for a adopting ;-P. > > Anyway, since it seems we both are interested, I've erased the owner for > > now. What is your motivation to want to adopt this package? Any specific > > reasons? (I'm just trying to see who would be the best one to adopt this > > one, and you didn't supply any additional information). > > My motivation, as usual, is having fun while helping Debian (I hope you don't > have any concerns with it =)). I'm also co-maintainer of inetutils, an > experimental package with similar funcionality, so I think to be quite > indicate for these packages in particular. Heh :), n/p. Regards, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
