Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:32:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229962: fixed in editline 1.12-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2004 17:43:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 27 09:43:20 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AlXFA-0003s9-00; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:43:20 -0800
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 5067D26BB8; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:43:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 912D2FFA0; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:42:35 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:42:35 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jim Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: editline -- Line editing library similar to readline - runtime
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-MIA-Summary: Orphaning: editline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of editline, Jim Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is
apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.
Some information about this package:
Package: editline
Binary: libeditline0, libeditline-dev
Version: 1.12-4
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Maintainer: Jim Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper, libtool
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.0.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/e/editline
Files: 659044f54b9a246fdf521b85e635ccd4 681 editline_1.12-4.dsc
143311cd47bc243fa63d1bf6ed53d872 15226 editline_1.12.orig.tar.gz
400b4b79470905fb8b0171977c3d926b 3912 editline_1.12-4.diff.gz
Package: libeditline-dev
Priority: optional
Section: libdevel
Installed-Size: 65
Maintainer: Jim Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Source: editline
Version: 1.12-4
Depends: libeditline0 (= 1.12-4), libc6-dev
Filename: pool/main/e/editline/libeditline-dev_1.12-4_i386.deb
Size: 16654
MD5sum: f5dc9cb47e665ab97515bd29e3e3d5a1
Description: Line editing library similar to readline - developer files
This is a line-editing library. It can be linked into almost any
program to provide command-line editing and recall.
It is call-compatible with a subset of the FSF readline library, but it
is a fraction of the size (and offers fewer features).
This is the developer files; static libraries, headers, manpages.
Package: libeditline0
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 48
Maintainer: Jim Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Source: editline
Version: 1.12-4
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
Filename: pool/main/e/editline/libeditline0_1.12-4_i386.deb
Size: 11648
MD5sum: 9ab2ab986c6bf13058fd5c9c277275c5
Description: Line editing library similar to readline - runtime
This is a line-editing library. It can be linked into almost any
program to provide command-line editing and recall.
It is call-compatible with a subset of the FSF readline library, but it
is a fraction of the size (and offers fewer features).
This is the runtime library only.
Justification: last seen March 2002, last MU Nov 2001, NMUs, packages in bad
shape
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 229962-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2004 23:34:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 31 15:34:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1An4dB-0006pY-00; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:34:29 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1An4ap-0004bJ-00; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:32:03 -0500
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $
Subject: Bug#229962: fixed in editline 1.12-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:32:03 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level:
Source: editline
Source-Version: 1.12-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
editline, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
editline_1.12-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/e/editline/editline_1.12-5.diff.gz
editline_1.12-5.dsc
to pool/main/e/editline/editline_1.12-5.dsc
libeditline-dev_1.12-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/editline/libeditline-dev_1.12-5_i386.deb
libeditline0_1.12-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/editline/libeditline0_1.12-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated editline
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:32:35 +0100
Source: editline
Binary: libeditline0 libeditline-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.12-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libeditline-dev - development files for libeditline
libeditline0 - line editing library similar to readline
Closes: 129544 131139 229962
Changes:
editline (1.12-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (Closes: #229962).
* debian/changelog:
+ Removed emacs helper variables.
* debian/control:
+ Set policy to 3.6.1.0.
+ Set debhelper build dependency to (>= 4.0).
+ Use the default dh_shlibs information, since the API is rock stable
(Closes: #131139).
+ Removed the libc6-dev dependency in the -dev package.
+ Rephrased the short and long descriptions.
* debian/copyright:
+ Replaced "Author(s)" with "Author".
* debian/rules:
+ Removed obsolete call to dh_suidregister.
+ Use debian/compat instead of DH_COMPAT.
* include_editline.h:
+ Added a minimalist /usr/include/editline.h (Closes: #129544).
* Makefile:
+ Call libtool with the proper --mode flags.
Files:
2dbaee5f96ddcac56b71d1635db40c61 605 devel optional editline_1.12-5.dsc
a8475ca66bbef6e6ff02c70ad7ff81bc 3943 devel optional editline_1.12-5.diff.gz
a23cc7cc4bb4c406fa0c0aee496e4c32 16330 libdevel optional
libeditline-dev_1.12-5_i386.deb
0425bd7b5989a1c545309c5056a3f157 11644 libs optional
libeditline0_1.12-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAHDhkfPP1rylJn2ERAsonAJ9gze6YNpKnYWDxzG8S+mqXPLPVaQCeMHtq
TzGDfqtmJCAbXIymaXMtjvc=
=zgv8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
