Your message dated Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:28:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line lib-dom-java have been adopted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2003 11:44:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 08 06:44:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from n02p127.netcamp.se (chrystal.opal.dhs.org) [62.119.125.127] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19Zqt9-00014y-00; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 06:44:04 -0500
Received: from ola by chrystal.opal.dhs.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 19Zqt9-00012D-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 13:44:03 +0200
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:44:02 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFA: lib-dom-java
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

I'd like someone to take over lib-dom-java. It should probably
be renamed to libdom-java. I have asked for its removal at least
one time (and it was removed) but apparently someone needed it
enough so it was put back again.

It has one release critical bug but that one should be trivial to
fix.

Regards,

// Ola

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                 654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 200456-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2004 14:29:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 19 06:29:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c2ce9f2c.adsl.oleane.fr (kowari.ilog.fr) [194.206.159.44] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AiaPJ-0006CK-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:29:38 -0800
Received: from bilby (bilby.ilog.fr [192.168.60.61])
        by kowari.ilog.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62037FFBA
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:29:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bilby (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 4C363805A; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:28:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:28:51 +0100
From: Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lib-dom-java have been adopted
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level: 


  The new 0.19990107-5 version have been uploaded on January 12th [1].
So I have now adopted this package.

  [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/lib-/lib-dom-java.html

---
Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to