Your message dated Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:47:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224293: fixed in castle-combat 0.7.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2003 17:56:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 17 11:56:47 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from acolyte.scowler.net [216.254.112.142] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AWf3y-0000eP-00; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:02:18 -0600
Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id A236970059; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:02:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:02:17 -0500
From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFA: castle-combat
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
        2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I no longer have time to take care of castle-combat.  Sam Hocevar has
expressed interest in taking it over.

Steve Kemp had sent in a buffer overflow patch which made it into the
package but which I never got around to sending to Karl.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 224293-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 01:27:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 08 19:27:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Aeixc-0001XY-00; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 16:49:04 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Aeivq-0002so-00; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:47:14 -0500
From: John Lightsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $
Subject: Bug#224293: fixed in castle-combat 0.7.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:47:14 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Source: castle-combat
Source-Version: 0.7.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
castle-combat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

castle-combat_0.7.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/castle-combat/castle-combat_0.7.4-4.diff.gz
castle-combat_0.7.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/c/castle-combat/castle-combat_0.7.4-4.dsc
castle-combat_0.7.4-4_alpha.deb
  to pool/main/c/castle-combat/castle-combat_0.7.4-4_alpha.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
John Lightsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated castle-combat package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  7 Jan 2004 11:29:12 -0600
Source: castle-combat
Binary: castle-combat
Architecture: source alpha
Version: 0.7.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: John Lightsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: John Lightsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 castle-combat - enclose land and destroy your opponent's castle
Closes: 224293
Changes: 
 castle-combat (0.7.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New Maintainer
     Thanks to Clint Adams for his past work on castle-combat
     closes: #224293
   * updated debian/copyright
   * updated debian/control
   * fixed unsigned char problems on ppc
     src/build.c
     src/game.c
     src/game.h
   * added -mieee to alpha CFLAGS to fix floating point exceptions
   * fixed debian/rules to handle DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip properly
   * fixed several minor gcc 3.3 warnings
Files: 
 c26e17d4f8d756acd68b530304682d2e 635 games optional castle-combat_0.7.4-4.dsc
 b6a8700b9f13017d390d255670162de8 25434 games optional 
castle-combat_0.7.4-4.diff.gz
 d53945973a617d2837c2d21701c2d353 1573546 games optional 
castle-combat_0.7.4-4_alpha.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE//doMCpnRFf3dM7gRAoqTAKDM3WNbcQD/Dp7o74GoTK6LMKOQtwCfZtg+
LMMxRp7fDyywi4ef1MxfuCE=
=yzGZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to