Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:57:34 +0000
with message-id <z6zhdhph2_smp...@hindley.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#935416: RFH: sysvinit - System-V-like init utilities
has caused the Debian Bug report #935416,
regarding RFH: sysvinit -- System-V-like init utilities
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
935416: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935416
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

I request help with maintaining sysvinit -- traditional init system.

Sysvinit system consists following parts:

 * small C program, that implements /sbin/init (sysvinit-core)
 * shell scripts that perform basic system initialization (initscripts)
 * tool to sort initscrpts invocation order (insserv)
 * tool to start initscripts in parallel (startpar)

Of these parts, initscripts are of most concern. There are huge number
of bugs, some dating back to 2004. Many of them no longer relevant, many
of them are wishlist, that were never discussed.

I ask for help triaging these bugs: marking them as confirmed or
unreproducible, requesting more info from submitter, leading discussion
on conflicting wishlists.

If you have skill and patience writing documentation, your help is also
extremely valuable. During years initscripts accumulated number of
configuration variable, files and so on, without having single,
exhaustive and authoritative list of these options.

Attachment: pgpr54TIUHpNx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Whilst contributions from the widest cross-section of the Debian community are
still welcome and encouraged, the original terms of this RFH are now less
relevant. Closing.

Mark

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to