Hi I also think it would be nice to upload, but upstream didn’t really make a decision as far as I can tell.
https://github.com/francoismichel/ssh3/issues/79 Maybe you could explain to upstream that this would get packaged if they did the renaming and a new release? Shipping it as “soh” if that isn’t where upstream is going seems potentially worse than just waiting a bit more to let upstream make some decision. If they already abandoned the project, maybe it doesn’t make sense to package it at all. /Simon > 6 feb. 2025 kl. 13:24 skrev Andrea Pappacoda <and...@pappacoda.it>: > > Hi Simon, > > Could you please consider packaging "ssh3" as "soh"? > > Upstream has already agreed to the rename, it just hasn't been done yet. You > wouldn't even need to write the patch yourself, as a pull request performing > the rename has been opened already at > <https://github.com/francoismichel/ssh3/pull/96>. > > I think having soh in Debian would be great. > > Bye! > >
