Hi NoisyCoil (and Andrej),
> Right now src:rust-usvg and src:rust-resvg are in NEW and will
> probably be rejected since they build librust-{u,re}svg-dev, which
> albeit having been removed from testing are still in unstable.Introduction of a binary package in another source package is not a reason for rejection, as I understand it: That sounds like the only way to, well, doing exactly that: Move a binary package to being maintained in another source package. While I don't expect the package to be rejected, please do anyway immediately upload an update to your packages which provides also the executables, to avoid bothering ftpmasters twice with a NEW processing. Yes, I have invested quite some time into packaging these, but my time has been mainly in building from true source (not from pre-generated not-preferred-form-for-editing assets distributed via crates.io), and composing a sensible migration path from previous maintenance to that (in my opinion) ideal packaging style. I have no special interest in maintaining these packages, however, and if your packaging style is different then there is no need for the work I have spent time on. So please go ahead and take over maintenance of these packages (if also ok with the previous maintainer, Andrej Shadura, obviously), just make sure that you take over all of it, not only the library parts. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
