Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As I stated in my RFA, I desired to be contacted before anyone took > over. This is because I uploaded a new package to an UploadQueue while > the archive was closed.
I see. > This is the changelog: > wmifs (1.3b1-12) unstable; urgency=low > . > * The "Why hasn't anyone taken over wmifs yet?" release. > * debian/changelog: recode as UTF-8. > * debian/control: > + build-depend on cdbs, bump debhelper to (>= 4.1.0). > + bump Standards-Version to 3.6.1.0. > * debian/compat: use debhelper 4. > * debian/rules: switch to cdbs. > Please base your package on this (even if you revert to debhelper or > whatever), and not on -11, as a few policy updates have taken place. I was going to bring the package to current policy standards anyway; thanks for doing it for me.. :-) As for cdbs, I never used it but I guess this is a good opportunity to learn... > I'm attaching the diff and dsc of -12. Thanks. > Thanks for taking over! I stopped using wmifs a month ago. My pleasure! I had considered offering to take over the package some weeks ago (around the time I took wmclock over) but it seemed pretty well maintained, so I didn't. I've been using wmifs for years, I wouldn't like to see it disappear from the archive. > Regarding the longstanding open bug report against wmifs, I think it's > fixed in the current versions, but it's difficult to know. I would > just close it, as the submitter never replied. I'll probably do just that, yes. Thanks for your reply, -- ,''`. : :' : Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `-
pgpFouZm8zXq7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
