On 2024-04-12 Abhijith PA <abhij...@debian.org> wrote: > On 12/04/24 03:34 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >>> On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 23:09:11 +0530 Abhijith PA <abhij...@debian.org> wrote: >>>> I would like to adopt this package. I maintain a mailing list server >>>> where I am already using postsrsd.
>> I guess you are not interested anymore? > I am interested. I have pushed latest upstream source to > salsa.(https://salsa.debian.org/debian/postsrsd). Made an upload for > Raju (Cc'ed). But I failed to package latest upstream to Debian repo. > I tried and hit at obstacle and then left at there. > I am happy to pass it you and Raju. Let me know. Hello, I am not going to adopt it (Using exim). It is just that I browsed over the open RC bug list and found both an RC bug (#1068053) and a ITA that did not look like it was going anywhere and wondered what was up. FWIW I played a little bit with 2.0.8 and got it to build with: a) extending b-d by libconfuse-dev, check, pkgconf, systemd-dev b) Patching cmake/FindCheck.cmake - find_path(Check_subunit_LIBRARY subunit HINTS ${PC_SUBUNIT_LIBRARY_DIRS}) + find_library(Check_subunit_LIBRARY subunit HINTS ${PC_SUBUNIT_LIBRARY_DIRS}) [This is now upstream issue #176) c) Invoking cmake with -DFETCHCONTENT_TRY_FIND_PACKAGE_MODE=ALWAYS (Borrowed from OpenSuse ;-) It is not enough to get a functioning package, but it is packaging and not compilation from there on. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
