Mahogany license can be changed if it turns out to be a problem. No developer attempts to "own" the package.
It is worse with c-client library. It is distributed under license similar to Pine and it must be statically linked to Mahogany. I doubt that University of Washington is willing to switch license and Mahogany without c-client is meaningless. I would like to see this package in Debian, but I must prevent disappointment when somebody discovers the c-client problem.
