Hi, please go with python-control for the source package name. This is required for consistency with https://repology.org/.
Regards, Stephan On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:30 AM Kurva Prashanth <krvprasha...@riseup.net> wrote: > > On 2023-09-21 23:50, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > Kurva Prashanth wrote... > > > >> * Package name : control > >> Version : 0.9.4 > >> Upstream Author : <Python Control Developers > >> <python-control-develop...@lists.sourceforge.net>> > >> * URL : http://python-control.org/ > > > > While I cannot judge whether this package is a sensible addition to > > Debian - I strongly ask you to re-consider the package name as "control" > > can apply to many different areas, and is therefore not helping when > > trying to figure if that package helps in a particular situation. > > Also, as there's the debian/control file in each source package, this > > will create some confusion and possibly even to users asking you for > > help with their packaging. > > > > Just from the above website, perhaps something like > > python-feedback-control-systems or a bit shorter variant would be more > > appropriate. I might be wrong. > > > > Christoph > I get what you're saying. Yes, "control" is a bit too general in deb > source packages. Your suggestion of "python-feedback-control-systems" > makes sense, and we'll I change package name. > > Regards, > Kurva Prashanth >
