On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 17:48:41 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > Sorry to be a pain again :) but: Do we really need this? > > Unfortunately yes for me, it is in the dep chain for Geo::GDAL::FFI, as for > https://wiki.debian.org/BookwormGdalPerl > which is my main goal to avoid to mantain an unofficial repo for the rest > of time.
You mean because of Alien::gdal? I can't really test now, because Geo::GDAL::FFI also needs the unpackaged FFI::Platypus::Declare, but from reading https://metacpan.org/release/AJOLMA/Geo-GDAL-FFI-0.1/source/Makefile.PL and https://metacpan.org/release/AJOLMA/Geo-GDAL-FFI-0.1/source/README.md a simple override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- GDAL=/usr plus build dependencies on gdal-bin (for /usr/bin/gdalinfo) and libgdal-dev might be enough without any Alien::gdal. Maybe :) (Not sure about https://metacpan.org/release/AJOLMA/Geo-GDAL-FFI-0.1/source/lib/Geo/GDAL/FFI.pm#L1567 but this is also guarded by an if()) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
