On 08/05/23 12:37 pm, Sandro Tosi wrote:
I just kept the upstream description. It could be removed if that is a problem.the upstream description is quite poor, as the Debian maintainer you should provide a better one; and at the same time remove the emojis, as they provide no value in describing what the package does (which is the sole purpose of the Description field)Just like other bugs, you can file a bug with appropriate severity and even offer a patch. This is uploaded already, and can be considered in the next upload (once accepted).the point of sending ITPs to d-devel is to get them reviewed. this is that review. please fix it now, given 1. it's not been accepted thru NEW yet, 2. you can commit the change right now to the repo, 3. there's no package to report a bug against, since it's not in the archive yet.
Fixed in NEW/3.7.0-2. Thanks for the review.I can understand the need to have good descriptions, but I don't think treating them as bugs of grave severity is warranted.
OpenPGP_0x8F53E0193B294B75.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
