Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:49:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Adopted package, closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2003 12:27:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 25 06:27:46 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from grolsch.xs4all.nl [213.84.185.122]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18neBV-0003fh-00; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 06:27:45 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by grolsch.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BD511AF0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:27:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: by grolsch.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D681611AEF; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:27:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:27:17 +0100
From: Stijn de Bekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFA: htdig -- WWW search system for an intranet or small internet
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Virus-Scanned: NAI Virus Scan for Linux (using AMaViS)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: 3.1.6-3
An excellent package to search in documents; searches html, word or
pdf documents using a webserver. Good upstream maintainance.
Due to a lack of time, I can't really maintain it anymore.
Stijn.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 182431-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2003 16:57:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 11:57:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from server.linuxbourg.ch (linuxbourg.ch) [212.203.64.16]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1Tzg-0003MW-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:57:00 -0500
Received: from ribnitz by linuxbourg.ch with local (Exim 4.10-mm1 #1 (Debian))
id 1A1TsT-0007oc-00 by authid <ribnitz>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:49:33 +0200
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:49:33 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Adopted package, closing bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Robert Ribnitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
close 184231
thanks
released 3 versions of the package, so I guess I forgot to close the
bug, which I now do.
Robert Ribnitz
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/bygdclvvwmQrEh0RArg2AJ9fr5cEtxSO5aJ/TGO8YzbBh/OqVACfXj4H
BeyNfwNPOHDoS14pPk7Bqn4=
=ZIpR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--
