Hi Martin-- On Thu 2022-07-14 20:11:23 +0200, Martin Dosch wrote:
> I had a look at gosop and it just builds fine, but has some lintian
> warnings:
>
> lintian -v --pedantic ../gosop_0.0\~git20220512.966ec01-1_amd64.changes
> W: gosop: hardening-no-pie [usr/bin/gosop]
> W: gosop: hardening-no-relro [usr/bin/gosop]
> W: gosop: no-manual-page [usr/bin/gosop]
I suspect these are issues with go packaging in general, and not
specific to gosop, so i wouldn't worry about them for this package
itself.
> Would it be fine for you if I push it to salsa or do you already have
> something in the pipeline?
I think it would be great if you could push what you've got to salsa!
Aníbal, please speak up if you have a different preference here. Martin
already did a bunch of the baseline work for this by packaging gopenpgp
earlier, so i think it would be great to have this next piece in debian!
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
